Blue Owl liquidity crisis has investors bracing for 2008-style fallout — it could mean bitcoin's next bull run
TL;DR
Blue Owl Capital's $1.4 billion asset sale to meet redemptions is being compared to Bear Stearns' 2007 collapse, potentially signaling broader financial stress. Similar to 2008, such crises could lead to massive government intervention, which historically fueled Bitcoin's rise from creation to a $1 trillion asset.
Key Takeaways
- •Blue Owl Capital's liquidity crisis through $1.4 billion in asset sales is drawing comparisons to Bear Stearns' 2007 collapse, seen as a potential 'canary-in-the-coal-mine' for broader financial stress.
- •Historical parallels suggest that financial crises (like 2008) often lead to massive government/Fed interventions (bailouts, QE), which previously helped birth Bitcoin and drive its bull runs.
- •While immediate credit stress may hurt risk assets including Bitcoin short-term, large-scale monetary responses could ultimately be bullish for Bitcoin, similar to patterns seen in 2020.
- •Bitcoin was created as a response to the 2008 crisis, aiming to provide an alternative to centralized financial systems, and its evolution into a mainstream asset could be reignited by new systemic stress.
- •The outcome depends on whether Blue Owl's issues remain isolated or trigger wider contagion, potentially validating Bitcoin's original thesis as a hedge against financial instability.

What to know:
- Facing investor calls for redemptions, private-equity company Blue Owl Capital (OWL) late this week said it is selling $1.4 billion in assets.
- Former Pimco chief Mohamed El-Erian suggested the news was a "canary-in-the-coal-mine" moment similar to 2007's collapse of two Bear Stearns hedge funds that presaged the global financial crisis.
- The U.S. government's and Federal Reserve's ultimate response — bank bailouts, ZIRP and QE — helped birth Bitcoin in early 2009 and foster its run from an idea to a $1 trillion asset.
- Facing investor calls for redemptions, private-equity company Blue Owl Capital (OWL) late this week said it is selling $1.4 billion in assets.
- Former Pimco chief Mohamed El-Erian suggested the news was a "canary-in-the-coal-mine" moment similar to 2007's collapse of two Bear Stearns hedge funds that presaged the global financial crisis.
- The U.S. government's and Federal Reserve's ultimate response — bank bailouts, ZIRP and QE — helped birth Bitcoin in early 2009 and foster its run from an idea to a $1 trillion asset.
Blue Owl Capital's (OWL) announcement this week that it would sell $1.4 billion in loans to raise liquidity for investors in a retail-focused private credit fund has triggered alarm bells across financial markets, with more than one prominent analyst drawing direct parallels to two Bear Stearns hedge fund collapses that foreshadowed the 2008 financial crisis — and for bitcoin BTC$67,989.08 investors, the implications could be profound.
While there was no damage across the major stock market averages, Blue Owl shares fell about 14% for the week and are now lower by more than 50% year-over-year. Other major private-equity players, including Blackstone (BX), Apollo Global (APO), and Ares Management (ARES), also suffered sizable declines.
It stirred some painful memories for those who suffered through the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC).
In August 2007, two Bear Stearns hedge funds collapsed after suffering heavy losses on subprime mortgage-backed securities, while BNP Paribas froze withdrawals in three funds, citing an inability to value U.S. mortgage assets. Credit markets seized up, liquidity evaporated, and what seemed like an isolated incident spiraled into the global financial crisis.
"Is this a 'canary-in-the-coalmine' moment, similar to August 2007," asked former Pimco head Mohamed El-Erian. "There’s plenty to think about here, starting with the risks of an investing phenomenon in [artificial intelligence] markets that has gone too far," he continued. El-Erian was quick to point out that while the risks could be systemic, they don't appear to be anywhere near the magnitude of the 2008 crisis.
Blue Owl's issue may or may not be another Bear Stearns moment, but if it is, what might that mean for bitcoin?
First, private credit stress doesn't automatically mean bitcoin rallies. In fact, in the short term, tighter credit conditions can hurt risk assets, bitcoin and the broader crypto market among them. While bitcoin wasn't around during the 2008 meltdown (more on that later), the price action as the Covid crisis was unfolding — about a 70% decline from mid-February 2020 to mid-March — is illuminating.
The U.S. government's Federal Reserve's eventual response, though, could be powerfully bullish for bitcoin. In 2020, trillions of dollars were injected into the economy, helping send BTC from a low of below $4,000 to more than $65,000 about a year later.
The 2007-2008 playbook followed a similar trajectory: initial credit market stress, equity market denial, banking sector contagion, then massive central bank intervention. If Blue Owl represents the "first domino" — as former Peter Lynch associate George Noble suggested — the sequence could repeat with private credit replacing subprime mortgages as the trigger.
"Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
One of the major outcomes of the 2008 event was the creation of Bitcoin.
The world's original cryptocurrency was born during the global financial crisis, in part because its mysterious creator (or creators), Satoshi Nakamoto, was disillusioned with governments and central banks conjuring up hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars with little more than a few keystrokes on a computer.
Another major part of the world's largest digital asset was to create a parallel digital currency that would allow direct peer-to-peer online payments without the need for a financial institution or any government intervention. Essentially, hope was to create a direct alternative to a legacy banking system that had just proved fragile enough to bring down the global financial order through the meddling of centralized entities.
In fact, Bitcoin's first-ever block, the so-called Genesis Block on Jan. 3, 2009, was embedded by Satoshi with "Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks." That was the headline in The Times of London that day as the U.K. government and the Bank of England engineered a response to the ongoing troubles in that country's financial sector.
Worth essentially zero on that day and unknown to all but a small handful of "cypherpunks," bitcoin, 17 years later, has a market cap topping $1 trillion and has the largest asset managers on the planet calling it a near-essential asset to own for most portfolios.
Bitcoin, as we now know it, of course, is different from the original cryptocurrency in 2009. Today, the notion of "store of value" and "digital gold" has come and gone. What was supposed to be anti-establishment has become part of the larger financial system. Large holders are hoarding massive amounts of bitcoin on their balance sheets, financial giants are offering bitcoin to the masses via exchange-traded funds, and even some government entities are buying for their strategic reserves.
So does the Blue Owl failure mean another resurgence of Bitcoin's original thesis and, in turn, another bull run? Time will tell, but if this event turns out to be El-Erian's "canary," signalling another sizable crisis, the global financial system might be in for a rude awakening, and Bitcoin might just become the solution, whatever form it's taken 17 years later.
- U.S. searches for “bitcoin zero” on Google hit a record high in February as BTC slid toward $60,000 after hitting a peak in October.
- In the rest of the world, searches for the term peaked in August, suggesting fear is concentrated in the U.S. rather than worldwide.
- Similar U.S. search spikes in 2021 and 2022 coincided with local bottoms.
- Because Google Trends measures relative interest on a 0-to-100 scale amid a much larger bitcoin user base today, the latest U.S. spike signals elevated retail anxiety, but does not reliably guarantee a clean contrarian reversal.
Disclosure & Polices: CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of Bullish (NYSE:BLSH), an institutionally focused global digital asset platform that provides market infrastructure and information services. Bullish owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets and CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish equity-based compensation.