Polymarket bettors appear to have insider-traded on a market designed to catch insider traders

AI Summary4 min read

TL;DR

Polymarket prediction market on ZachXBT's insider trading investigation saw $40M volume before Axiom was named. New wallets bet heavily on Axiom pre-reveal, earning over $1M profit, suggesting insider knowledge. Lack of identity checks makes tracing difficult despite Axiom's investigation.

Key Takeaways

  • Polymarket prediction market on ZachXBT's insider trading accusation generated $40M volume before Axiom was revealed as target
  • On-chain analysis shows newly created wallets bet heavily on Axiom just before reveal, earning over $1M profit
  • Axiom employees knew about investigation before publication, creating potential for insider trading on the prediction market
  • Polymarket's lack of identity verification makes tracing potential insider bets difficult
  • The market mechanism worked as designed but ended up rewarding subjects of the investigation rather than investigators
(Modified by CoinDesk)

What to know:

  • A Polymarket prediction market on which crypto firm ZachXBT would accuse of insider trading saw about $40 million in volume before he named Axiom as the target.
  • On-chain analysts say a small cluster of newly created wallets bet heavily on Axiom just before the reveal, generating more than $1 million in profit and suggesting someone had advance knowledge.
  • Because Polymarket does not require identity checks and Axiom employees knew of the investigation ahead of publication, any potential insider betting may be difficult to trace even as Axiom says it is investigating.
  • A Polymarket prediction market on which crypto firm ZachXBT would accuse of insider trading saw about $40 million in volume before he named Axiom as the target.
  • On-chain analysts say a small cluster of newly created wallets bet heavily on Axiom just before the reveal, generating more than $1 million in profit and suggesting someone had advance knowledge.
  • Because Polymarket does not require identity checks and Axiom employees knew of the investigation ahead of publication, any potential insider betting may be difficult to trace even as Axiom says it is investigating.

Can you insider-trade on an investigation into your own insider trading? Polymarket just turned that question from philosophical to practical.

Blockchain sleuth ZachXBT published findings Thursday morning naming Axiom, a crypto trading platform, as the company whose employees he believed had used non-public information to place profitable trades.

The investigation had been teased for days, and Polymarket had created a contract allowing users to bet on which company would be named, pulling in roughly $40 million in volume since Monday.

The problem is that someone clearly knew the answer before it dropped.

Lookonchain identified 12 wallets that bet heavily on Axiom before the reveal, netting a combined profit of over $1 million.

A separate analysis by Polysights, a data terminal that tracks suspicious activity on Polymarket's public ledger, flagged five wallets that collectively wagered around $50,000 and walked away with $266,000.

PolySights data shows numerous 'high-conviction' bets from newly made wallets. (PolySights)

More on-chain data analyzed by CoinDesk tells the full story. The largest Yes holder on the Axiom market, an account called predictorxyz, accumulated 477,415 shares at an average price of $0.14 and is now sitting on $411,000 in profit.

That's roughly a 7x return on a bet placed before the answer was public. The second-largest holder, an anonymous wallet, bought 109,450 shares at $0.33. The concentration is notable. This wasn't a broad market full of informed guesses. A handful of wallets dominated the Axiom side of the book.

(Polymarket)

For most of the week, another platform called Meteora had been the market's frontrunner at over 50% odds, as CoinDesk reported.

The odds swung to Axiom on late Wednesday, which peaked at 46.2%. Anyone buying Axiom shares in the window between that denial and ZachXBT's Thursday morning publication was either reading the room extremely well or already knew what was coming.

ZachXBT acknowledged on social media that he had contacted Axiom for comment and conducted several interviews before publishing, making a leak "probably inevitable."

That means multiple people at the company knew the report was coming before it went live. Any of them could have placed bets directly or tipped someone who did.

Polymarket's offshore platform doesn't conduct identity checks, making attribution difficult without cooperation from the exchange itself.

Axiom said it was "shocked and disappointed" by the findings and would continue to investigate. It didn't respond to questions about whether it was aware of any employees trading on the Polymarket wager.

The structural irony here is that the mechanism worked exactly as designed. It just happened to reward the people who were the subject of the investigation rather than the ones conducting it.

  • Large bitcoin ETF holders and corporate treasuries are aggressively buying six- and 12-month put options at $60,000 or below as insurance against a potential price drop, Deribit said.
  • Open interest in $60,000 bitcoin puts on Deribit has climbed to about $1.5 billion, the highest across all strikes and expiries,

Disclosure & Polices: CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of Bullish (NYSE:BLSH), an institutionally focused global digital asset platform that provides market infrastructure and information services. Bullish owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets and CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish equity-based compensation.

Visit Website