Lighter founder: The anti-Syllabus algorithm will not be made public; appeals are possible if a wrongful judgment is made.
TL;DR
Lighter founder Vladimir Novakovski states that the anti-Syllabus algorithm for witch screening will not be disclosed to avoid optimization targeting. An appeal mechanism is available for users who feel unfairly judged, with confidence in the algorithm's results based on data science and consultations.
Tags
Foresight News , Lighter founder and CEO Vladimir Novakovski responded to the witch screening issue during an interview with jez (@izebel_eth) on Twitter Space today, stating: "We have an appeal mechanism for the witch screening, but so far, the number of appeals is less than we expected. If users feel the algorithm is unfair to them, they are welcome to fill out the appeal form on Discord. We will not disclose the specific details of the algorithm because we do not want it to be targeted for optimization."
Overall, this is a significant data science endeavor, including cluster analysis and behavioral pattern recognition. Our quantitative team (whose daily work involves liquidity and market maker integration) has also spent several weeks involved. Furthermore, we've consulted with several protocol providers who have done similar work, as well as individual witch hunters. We are confident in the final results, but if any misjudgment is indeed found, please appeal.
Our position is very clear: value will ultimately be embodied in the token, and all investors participate under this premise. We adhere to one principle: the token will be the core alignment mechanism for all stakeholders—early users, the team, and investors are all in the same boat. There will be no dual-track structure where the token has one set of value logic and equity has another; everything will revolve around the token.