Aave slides as community debates over who controls the brand

AI Summary5 min read

TL;DR

Aave governance is debating control over brand assets like domains and social media, with a proposal to transfer ownership to token holders. The dispute has caused procedural drama and an 11% drop in the AAVE token price.

Key Takeaways

•Aave community is debating whether AAVE token holders should formally own brand assets to prevent unilateral control.
•The proposal has sparked procedural conflict, with accusations of rushing to a vote and breaking trust.
•The outcome tests a broader DeFi issue of on-chain vs. off-chain control over brand assets and governance.

An Aave community discussion on brand ownership has become a debate on process. (Midjourney/Modified by CoinDesk)

What to know:

Aave governance is debating control over its brand assets, including domains and social media, which are currently managed by third parties.
Ernesto Boado, co-founder of BGD Labs, argues that AAVE token holders should formally own these assets to prevent unilateral control over the protocol's identity, and said the proposal was moved to a vote too quickly.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov insists that the governance process for the proposal was legitimate.

Aave governance is debating control over its brand assets, including domains and social media, which are currently managed by third parties.
Ernesto Boado, co-founder of BGD Labs, argues that AAVE token holders should formally own these assets to prevent unilateral control over the protocol's identity, and said the proposal was moved to a vote too quickly.
Aave founder Stani Kulechov insists that the governance process for the proposal was legitimate.

A dispute over who controls the brand and online presence of Aave, a decentralized lending platform, has spilled into governance and procedures, knocking the AAVE token sharply lower, down 11% in the past 24 hours.

The flashpoint is a governance discussion post from BGD Labs co-founder Ernesto Boado that argues AAVE holders should take formal control of Aave’s “brand assets” such as domains, social handles, naming rights and other gateways. BGD Labs is a group founded by three members of the community that surfaced in 2022.

Leaving those assets in any third party’s hands creates a structural imbalance, according to Boado. Even if a contributor is acting in good faith today, unilateral control over aave.com and the main social media accounts can be used to steer narratives, product distribution and monetization in ways the DAO cannot meaningfully check, Boado said.

Boado’s proposal is framed as an ownership issue first and a product debate second. It does not say Aave Labs should not build the interface or ship products. It argues that the DAO should own the core identity and access points, then decide how those assets can be used, including whether any party gets permission to run them under enforceable terms.

The debate quickly turned into procedural drama.

After several days of discussion, Aave founder Stani Kulechov moved the proposal to a Snapshot vote.

Boado objected, saying the proposal was not being advanced in the spirit he intended. He said Aave Labs had rushed it to a vote, put his name on it and did so without notifying him. In his words, it broke trust and cut short a discussion that was producing meaningful new points.

Kulechov responded saying the process followed established governance norms.

In a post on X, Kulechov said the proposal had been discussed for roughly five days — claiming it to be a typical window before moving to a Snapshot vote — and complied with Aave’s governance framework.

He added that the DAO has previously brought proposals to a vote even when the original authors were third parties.

The outcome of the vote will not just settle an Aave argument. It will test a broader DeFi tension of whether DAOs can own smart contracts onchain, but control over brands and interfaces still tends to sit offchain, where governance is slower, rights are murkier and incentives can diverge.

As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.
GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.
Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.

BlackRock named its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) one of its top three investment themes for 2025, despite bitcoin falling more than 4% this year.
IBIT has attracted over $25 billion in inflows since January, making it the sixth most popular ETF by new investment this year.
The move signals BlackRock’s conviction that bitcoin belongs in diversified portfolios, even as traditional alternatives outperform.

Disclosure & Polices: CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of Bullish (NYSE:BLSH), an institutionally focused global digital asset platform that provides market infrastructure and information services. Bullish owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets and CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish equity-based compensation.