Sign InSign Up

The Cloud Is Not Your Computer: Why Go and Rust Developers Secretly Miss the Monolith

AI Summary5 min read

TL;DR

Cloud computing introduces complex, unpredictable systems that contrast with the deterministic nature of Go and Rust. While these languages provide discipline in chaotic environments, modern engineering requires understanding distributed systems beyond just coding. The cloud abstracts responsibility but amplifies complexity and cost.

Key Takeaways

  • •The cloud creates unpredictable, distributed systems where control is an illusion, unlike the deterministic nature of Go and Rust code.
  • •Go embraces failure as a first-class value, making it suitable for distributed systems where everything can fail.
  • •Rust enforces correctness at compile time but can't prevent cloud infrastructure issues like IAM misconfigurations.
  • •Modern cloud engineering requires understanding network topology, observability, failure domains, and cost modeling, not just coding.
  • •Cloud abstractions leak through errors, results, and invoices, making systems more complex despite promises of simplicity.

Tags

gorustcloudaws

I have deployed code to:

  • Bare metal servers that screamed when the fan failed.
  • VPS machines that mysteriously rebooted at 3AM.
  • Kubernetes clusters that required three YAML sacrifices and a Helm incantation.
  • And of course, AWS — where the bill is the only truly consistent runtime.

And after years of “cloud-native architecture,” I’ve realized something uncomfortable:

The cloud is not your computer.
It’s a negotiation.

The Illusion of Control

When you write Go:

err := db.QueryRowContext(ctx, query).Scan(&user.ID)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It feels deterministic.

When you write Rust:

let user = repo.find_user(id).await?;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It feels safe. Structured. Controlled. Owned.

You think:

I wrote this code. I understand this system.

But in the cloud?

  • Your “server” is virtual.
  • Your “disk” is network-attached.
  • Your “network” is software-defined.
  • Your “security boundary” is an IAM policy someone copy-pasted from StackOverflow.

You are not running software.

You are renting probability.

Go: The Language of Optimists

Go was built at Google for large distributed systems.
It assumes failure.

if err != nil {
    return err
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

That’s not error handling.

That’s distributed system trauma.

Go developers understand something frontend engineers often don’t:

Everything fails.
Everything times out.
Everything retries.
Everything lies.

And AWS amplifies that truth.

Your Lambda cold starts.
Your ECS task reschedules.
Your EKS node disappears.
Your RDS connection pool silently dies.

Go doesn’t fight this chaos.

It shrugs and returns error.

Rust: The Language of Control Freaks

Rust says:

You don’t get memory unless you prove you deserve it.

It forces you to confront ownership, lifetimes, and mutability.

And then we deploy that beautifully memory-safe binary into:

  • A container
  • On a node
  • On a cluster
  • In a VPC
  • Behind a load balancer
  • Behind a CDN
  • Behind a WAF
  • Behind someone else’s data center

You eliminated use-after-free.

Congratulations.

Now debug why your pod can’t reach S3 because your IAM role lacks s3:ListBucket.

The New Stack: YAML All The Way Down

There was a time when “stack trace” meant something.

Now the stack looks like this:

  • Rust binary
  • Docker
  • Kubernetes
  • Helm
  • Terraform
  • AWS
  • IAM
  • VPC
  • Subnet
  • Route table
  • NAT gateway
  • Internet gateway
  • Cloud provider control plane
  • Unknown planetary alignment

You fix a bug in your code.

The problem was a security group.

You increase CPU.

The problem was file descriptor limits.

You scale horizontally.

The problem was a missing index.

We used to debug functions.

Now we debug ecosystems.

AWS: The Most Expensive Distributed Systems Course in History

AWS doesn’t break loudly.

It degrades gracefully.

Which is worse.

Your service doesn’t crash.
It just slows down enough for users to leave quietly.

And the billing dashboard?
It scales perfectly.

You don’t notice a bug because of logs.

You notice it because your credit card calls you.

The Monolith Was Honest

Say what you want about monoliths.

They were:

  • Predictable
  • Deployable
  • Understandable
  • Debuggable

When something broke, you SSH’d into one machine.
You checked logs.
You fixed it.

Now?

You open:

  • CloudWatch
  • X-Ray
  • Prometheus
  • Grafana
  • Jaeger
  • Datadog
  • And three tabs of Terraform

And you still don’t know why 503 is happening.

But Here’s the Twist

Despite all of this…

Go and Rust are thriving in the cloud.

Why?

Because they are honest languages in a dishonest environment.

Go embraces failure as a first-class value.
Rust enforces correctness at compile time.
Both reduce uncertainty in systems that are fundamentally uncertain.

The cloud is chaos.

Go and Rust are discipline.

And that tension is exactly why they belong together.

The Real Skill Isn’t Coding Anymore

The best cloud engineers today aren’t just good at writing code.

They understand:

  • Network topology
  • IAM blast radius
  • Observability strategy
  • Latency budgets
  • Backpressure
  • Failure domains
  • Cost modeling

In other words:

We didn’t stop being systems engineers.

We just outsourced the hardware and multiplied the complexity.

Final Thought

In the end, the cloud didn’t make engineering easier.

It made responsibility abstract.

And abstraction is power.

But every abstraction leaks.

Go leaks through error.
Rust leaks through Result.
AWS leaks through your invoice.

The monolith never lied to you.

The cloud smiles politely while charging by the millisecond.

Visit Website