CZ tweeted in support of Siyuan: Donating money does not equate to being able to "command" the other party; burning BNB benefits token holders.
TL;DR
CZ supports Siyuan's decision to destroy donations, stating that donations don't obligate recipients to follow donor wishes and that burning BNB benefits holders by reducing supply.
Tags
Odaily Odaily reports that CZ (@cz_binance) posted on X, agreeing with and supporting Siyuan's decision to destroy all donations made by Happy-Sci creator Siyuan. In his tweet, CZ stated that donating to others does not obligate them to act according to the donor's wishes; he also noted that Siyuan clearly did not want any association with related memes; and that redirecting donations to YZiLabs or platform employees would increase the company's processing difficulties. Regarding the destruction of BNB, CZ stated that it was not a waste, mentioning that BNB Chain has recently destroyed over $1 billion worth of BNB each quarter, resulting in a deflationary total supply and benefiting BNB holders; as a BNB holder, he expressed his gratitude to anyone who destroyed their BNB.