The 'stablecoin sandwich' is dead: Why the next phase of crypto payments is all about the user relationship

AI Summary6 min read

TL;DR

The stablecoin market is maturing as issuance becomes commoditized. The next competitive phase focuses on user distribution and relationships, with companies like Meta leveraging their massive user bases. Ownership of end-user touchpoints now creates more value than stablecoin orchestration itself.

Key Takeaways

  • Stablecoin issuance is becoming a commodity with multiple providers, shifting competition to distribution and user relationships.
  • Companies like Meta, Google, and Apple will use multiple stablecoin providers rather than branded tokens, focusing on enabling preferred payment methods.
  • The real competitive advantage lies in owning direct relationships with end users, with Meta's billions of users across its platforms giving it significant leverage.
  • Card networks and fintechs with existing user touchpoints can defend their businesses by commoditizing payment rails while maintaining distribution advantages.
  • True open and neutral networks remain a challenge, with established blockchains like Ethereum potentially offering more practical solutions than proprietary alternatives.
Christian Catalini (Chainlink Labs)
Diem co-creator and MIT professor Christian Catalini (Chainlink Labs modified by CoinDesk)

What to know:

  • If large companies start using commodified stablecoins from multiple providers, the key question becomes: Who owns the distribution?
  • Meta said its stablecoin plans are about enabling people and businesses to make payments on our platforms using their preferred method.
  • If large companies start using commodified stablecoins from multiple providers, the key question becomes: Who owns the distribution?
  • Meta said its stablecoin plans are about enabling people and businesses to make payments on our platforms using their preferred method.

You can't have missed the stablecoin vibe. While bitcoin BTC$67,067.25 and the rest of the crypto market are in the doldrums after falling from record highs in October, everyone else is talking about issuing tokens whose value is fixed, pegged to a real-world asset. Mostly the dollar.

Not only the dollar, of course. This week alone, AllUnity, a German joint venture between DWS, Galaxy, and Flow Trader, issued a Swiss franc-based token (CHFAU) and SBI Holdings and Startale Group introduced a yen version (JPYSC). Earlier this month, Agant said it's working on a pound stablecoin, and Hong Kong said it plans to start handing out stablecoin licenses in March.

Then there's the revelation that Mark Zuckerberg-led Meta (META) is looking to add stablecoin-based payment capabilities early in the second half of the year. The company famously tried and failed to introduce the Libra stablecoin, renamed Diem in 2019, in the face of stiff opposition from lawmakers and regulators.

But Meta’s proposed return to stablecoin-based payments later this year bears little comparison with Libra/Diem, according to the co-creator of Libra, Christian Catalini, who is now a professor at MIT and the founder of the MIT Cryptoeconomics Lab.

What's different now, says Catalini, is that stablecoins are fading into the background, offered by multiple providers and becoming part of the payments infrastructure. The once-hyped businesses of stablecoin issuance and orchestration, or the coordination of payments across different blockchains and conversion between token and fiat for payment purposes, are becoming a commodity, he said.

“Not just Meta, but also Google, Apple, all of them will be using multiple providers, as is the case when they do disbursements of payments,” Catalini said in an interview with CoinDesk. “So I would expect the market to be commodified in the future, rather than a branded stablecoin. In a sense, it's a sign that the market has matured.”

This sentiment was also voiced by Meta’s VP of communications, Andy Stone, who said the move to bring stablecoin payments back was simply “about enabling people and businesses to make payments on our platforms using their preferred method.”

Billions of users

The real competitive advantage in stablecoins, the moat that holds competitors at bay, now lies in distribution, said Catalini. Whoever owns the direct relationship with the end user will capture the most value. And Meta has billions of users across Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, almost 3.6 billion according to its most recent earnings report.

The focus on contacts and reach is a marked change from accruing value by delivering stablecoins to a wallet, or going from fiat to crypto and then back to fiat — the so-called stablecoin sandwich required for regular payment transactions.

This change has started to play out recently, with news about companies walking away from acquiring stablecoin orchestration companies.

It's also good news for incumbents such as the card networks, fintechs, neobanks and some wallet firms who have an advantage because they actually own the touch point with the end user, Catalini pointed out. Stablecoin payments threaten to cut the lucrative interchange fees payment networks like Visa and Mastercard claim, but the card networks have a significant advantage when it comes to distribution.

“If [the card networks] can commoditize the rails and commoditize the assets, they will be able to defend their business,” Catalini said. “The commoditization of the assets is inevitable — there's going to be many stablecoins and many banks will want their own — so the rails are where things will get interesting.”

Also in the fray is Stripe, Meta's long-time payment partner whose CEO Patrick Collison joined Meta's board of directors a year ago and is a potential vendor that Meta might enlist for its stablecoin project.

The payments giant’s aggressive crypto power plays are not to be underestimated: Stripe bought stablecoin specialist Bridge for $1.1 billion last year, and has built its own blockchain called Tempo.

Still, Catalini questioned whether other firms will flock to a competitor’s blockchain, even if it’s purportedly a public network.

“If you are another big payment service provider, would you want to build on Stripe's Tempo? Probably not,” Catalini said. “It goes back to the key challenge of making these networks truly open and neutral, which is the entire point of crypto. But of course, it's a hard one to actually deliver on from a practical perspective, unless you're building on something already established like Ethereum, Bitcoin, or Solana.”


  • Bitcoin's future hinges less on technological factors and more on how AI affects growth, employment, real interest rates, and central bank liquidity, NYDIG argues.
  • If AI causes job losses, policymakers may inject liquidity to stabilize the economy, benefiting bitcoin; conversely, if AI boosts productivity without major job losses, rising real yields could pressure bitcoin valuations.
  • Past technological disruptions triggered job loss fears but ultimately expanded productive capacity and created new industries, suggesting AI may follow a similar integration pattern.

Disclosure & Polices: CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of Bullish (NYSE:BLSH), an institutionally focused global digital asset platform that provides market infrastructure and information services. Bullish owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets and CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish equity-based compensation.

Visit Website